<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR Updated</title>
	<link>http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/pr-updated/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimisation Blog (SEO Blog)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: phx-keith</title>
		<link>http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/pr-updated/#comment-1075</link>
		<author>phx-keith</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/pr-updated/#comment-1075</guid>
					<description>PR is over rated.  To me, it is only an indicator that Google trusts a website.  It is given much more weight than it should be given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PR is over rated.  To me, it is only an indicator that Google trusts a website.  It is given much more weight than it should be given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/pr-updated/#comment-1080</link>
		<author>Chris</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/pr-updated/#comment-1080</guid>
					<description>I see and hear that many don't care much for PR any more. I guess people are looking for the next best thing... maybe page strength?!

At least PR is still a good indicator of the popularity of a page (inbound links).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see and hear that many don&#8217;t care much for PR any more. I guess people are looking for the next best thing&#8230; maybe page strength?!</p>
<p>At least PR is still a good indicator of the popularity of a page (inbound links).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
