Comments on: W3C Standards Compliant http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/ Search Engine Optimisation Blog (SEO Blog) Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:14:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2 By: Chris http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-4 Chris Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:28:44 +0000 http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-4 I have also heard of a couple of sites not working on MACs, well to be more precise... a form would not work. It turned out that the page was totally NOT W3C compliant and once it was corrected the form worked properly on the MAC. I have also heard of a couple of sites not working on MACs, well to be more precise… a form would not work. It turned out that the page was totally NOT W3C compliant and once it was corrected the form worked properly on the MAC.

]]> By: Adam http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-5 Adam Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:41:54 +0000 http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-5 Just one little thing that I thought was funny about this post...you said you are a bit of a perfectionist, must not refer to spelling, or is weither the correct spelling?lol...I do that all the time...that is forget to check spelling before I post...thanks for the advice, I have been working on a home improvement portal, and it has not been picked up by google, but the site directory has been picked up. Perhaps we should go through it and make sure it meets the standards. I was speaking with a collegue, and she said she has never come across a site that meets all of the standars. Just one little thing that I thought was funny about this post…you said you are a bit of a perfectionist, must not refer to spelling, or is weither the correct spelling?lol…I do that all the time…that is forget to check spelling before I post…thanks for the advice, I have been working on a home improvement portal, and it has not been picked up by google, but the site directory has been picked up. Perhaps we should go through it and make sure it meets the standards.
I was speaking with a collegue, and she said she has never come across a site that meets all of the standars.

]]> By: Chris http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-7 Chris Sat, 01 Jul 2006 03:52:39 +0000 http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-7 Haha, thanks for the pointer... Yes that is a bad habit of mine too (not proof reading a post), I corrected it thanks! It is a good thing that your <strong>standars</strong> will forgive me for this... lol! What do you mean by "never come across a site that meets all of the standars"? Occasionally, a page or two may break these guidelines, but I recon if you can keep 99% of your site standards compliant, you will do well. And it is possible to keep your site compliant, even a big directory! Haha, thanks for the pointer… Yes that is a bad habit of mine too (not proof reading a post), I corrected it thanks! It is a good thing that your standars will forgive me for this… lol!

What do you mean by “never come across a site that meets all of the standars”? Occasionally, a page or two may break these guidelines, but I recon if you can keep 99% of your site standards compliant, you will do well. And it is possible to keep your site compliant, even a big directory!

]]> By: PHP MySql Programmer / Developer http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-1076 PHP MySql Programmer / Developer Thu, 21 Jun 2007 23:54:25 +0000 http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-1076 You state "I have noticed that with every new site that I have launched that has been W3C Standards Compliant and the CSS file also validates, that it has quickly received a high PR from Google (PR4 or PR5)". I would think the PR4 or PR5 would be more a function of inbound links from other high PR sites. Please do not think I am saying valid HTML and CSS is not important because it is. You state “I have noticed that with every new site that I have launched that has been W3C Standards Compliant and the CSS file also validates, that it has quickly received a high PR from Google (PR4 or PR5)”.

I would think the PR4 or PR5 would be more a function of inbound links from other high PR sites.

Please do not think I am saying valid HTML and CSS is not important because it is.

]]> By: Chris http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-1079 Chris Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:11:10 +0000 http://www.the100lists.com/seoblog/w3c-standards-compliant/#comment-1079 Yeah, I totally agree with you! PR is basically calculated on inbound links. Yeah, I totally agree with you! PR is basically calculated on inbound links.

]]>